[debate] Let's discuss DRM

[Alan Light]

I (Alan) wrote:
"Not all of my computers and computerized devices are connected to the net.  I dislike this trend and find it insulting." 

Imri wrote:
"I believe you are referring to the trend and not to my words. On the off-chance I might be misreading, I apologize - I didn't mean to insult you."


Sorry, I was not clear enough.  You offered no offense - it is the trend of companies assuming I want and have an internet connection for every computing device and that I should be required to use an internet connection to use a product I buy from them that I find insulting.  Online updates and all are nice, but they should not be required.

Otherwise:

Imri wrote:
"I'm not sure. If people get used to not being able to copy their music around - well, they'll be used to it."

I suppose people can get used to anything.  Still, I suspect this will be a bit of a stretch, after being used to records/tapes/CDs that could be taken anywhere and played on a friend's player, or on successive players or players in various rooms, vehicles, or of the portable variety.  Taking a step forward is enticing and perhaps worthy of spending a little money.  Taking a step backwards is not so attractive.

Imri wrote:
"So, conversely, if copyright laws are altered to be less restricting, DRM use will increase?"

An interesting proposition.  Quite possible, especially if copyright were severely limited or eliminated altogether.  However, reasonable steps like restoring copyright to a 14 year term - I don't think would make much difference.  Keep in mind that DRM seldom works well anyway, and does absolutely nothing to stop well-funded counterfeiters.



Alan


      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://whitestar.linuxbox.org/pipermail/debate/attachments/20090523/9a9fca6e/attachment.htm>