[debate] global warming is b/s? nice hatchet job

[Peter Jukes]

Hold on. Why is this whole debate geared round the problems of action? What
if the majority of scientists are right, and the main problem is  inaction?
Just sayin'. Having lived nearly 50 years on this planet, the voices of
those who say 'it's ok' are, in my experience, the loudest

On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:54 PM, Brian Loe <knobdy at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Anton Chuvakin <anton at chuvakin.org>wrote:
>
>> And, finally, I simply loved, loved this one:
>>
>> >There might be one good thing about the global warming controversy,
>> however.  There are a lot of people who need to feel that they
>> >are doing something important, and if they aren't given some relatively
>> harmless cause to advocate for and against, they might just
>> >be liable to do REAL damage.
>>
>> Totally on target!
>>
>
> This isn't a good thing. Its not only NOT helpful but it could be VERY
> damaging. The old saying "the road to hell is paved with good itentions" is
> about this exactly. Pass all of these hysteria-driven environmental rules
> and you'll kill the economy, kill people and do nothing for the environment.
> That's not harmless.
>
> _______________________________________________
> debate mailing list
> debate at whitestar.linuxbox.org
> http://whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/debate
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://whitestar.linuxbox.org/pipermail/debate/attachments/20090715/d0aa5012/attachment.htm>