[debate] global warming is b/s? nice hatchet job
Brian Loe
knobdy at gmail.com
Sun Jul 12 14:59:28 UTC 2009
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 4:12 AM, Jon Kibler <Jon.Kibler at aset.com> wrote:
>
>
> With such an abysmal public understanding of science, it is no wonder that
> politicians, hucksters (e.g., Rush Limbaugh), and religions leaders are
> able to
> invent "facts" and twist public opinion at will.
>
> Jon K
This would be called a non-argument. Are we supposed to, now, debate whether
or not Rush Limbaugh is a huckster? Or, better, attack Al Gore in the same
manner?
What does one think of a someone who enters the debate to argue the
participants' religious and political beliefs rather than a position in the
debate?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://whitestar.linuxbox.org/pipermail/debate/attachments/20090712/d91dd4d6/attachment.htm>
More information about the debate
mailing list